The author talks about the new idea of considering the brain as a computer feels bad for the loss of deep reading and intellectual stimulation it offers for ones brains.
Is it generated by our recently developed weakness for information snacks? And even much harder to understand how technology can actually recapture and re-enable human abilities- it allows us to work more efficiently, to meet new interesting people, and of course for pure entertainment.
James Olds, a professor of computational neuroscience, who directs the Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study at George Mason Universitywas quoted in Carr's essay for his expertise, and upon the essay's publication Olds wrote a letter to the editor of The Atlantic in which he reiterated that the brain was "very plastic" — referring to the changes that occur in the organization of the brain as a result of experience.
It has nothing to do with Google but everything to do with our limited attention span. Moreover, one might be good at multitasking, but creativity would be affected significantly. Let me elaborate. The result is to scatter our attention and diffuse our concentration.
Unlike footnotes, to which they're sometimes likened, hyperlinks don't merely point to related works; they propel you toward them. What if Carr is right? What Google and the World Wide Web are doing is helping people to learn by providing them variety of choices, getting us with access to plenty of tools, platforms, materials and other web resources.